Which statement correctly identifies the relationship between exceptions and control flow in Python?

The statement that exceptions disrupt the normal control flow of the program is accurate because exceptions are designed to signal that an error or an unusual condition has occurred during the execution of a program. When an exception is raised, the normal flow of execution is interrupted, and the program tries to find an exception handler that can manage the error. If one is not found, the program will terminate. This process allows developers to create more robust code that can handle unexpected situations gracefully without crashing.

In Python, when an exception is thrown, control is transferred from the point where the exception occurred to the nearest exception handler, which can be implemented using try and except blocks. This mechanism allows for finer control over program behavior in the presence of errors. As a result, exceptions serve as a powerful tool for managing control flow in situations where operations might not complete normally.

The other statements do not accurately describe the relationship between exceptions and control flow. For instance, while exceptions may lead to a failure in execution if unhandled, they are not solely responsible for preventing code from running successfully. Additionally, exceptions do not represent conditional branching in the same way that if-else statements do; they are a separate mechanism altogether. Lastly, exceptions are not restricted to being handled in the main function;